News
Court Decisions
Articles and
Info
Parental Consent
Pro-Life and
Anti-Abortion Organizations
Texas Alliance for Life
The method of killing a human child - one
cannot even accurately say an
entirely unborn human child - proscribed by this statute is so horrible
that
the most clinical description of it evokes a shudder of revulsion.
-- Justice Antonin Scalia, dissenting in
Stenberg v. Carhart
Sonography in connection with induced
abortion
may have psychological hazards. Seeing a blown-up, moving image of the
embryo she is carrying can be distressing to a woman who is about to
undergo an abortion, Dr. Sally Faith Dorfman noted. She stressed that
the screen should be turned away from the patient.
-- "Obstetrics and Gynecology News"
editorial
February 15-28, 1986
We know that it's killing. But the state
permits killing under certain circumstances.
-- Dr. Neville Sender, abortion clinic
founder,
quoted by Pro-choice
author Magda Denes in her book "In Neccessity and Sorrow: Life and
Death Inside and Abortion Clinic"
The University of Texas at Austin
|
University Life Advocates is a campus
pro-life student group which is dedicated to preserving the life ethic
by opposing abortion, euthanasia, and infanticde. These practices
degrade not only the victims but also those who participate in them;
one does not exercise one's rights by denying basic human rights to
others. By organizing and opposing activities that destroy innocent
human life, we hope to promote a stronger sense of respect for
it.
Contact us at ulifeadvocates@yahoo.com
January 26, 2006
ULA sponsored the Roe vs. Wade Rally on UT campus today, bringing in
Molly White and other women from Operation Outcry who shared their
personal stories of how abortion hurt them. This weekend
(Saturday, January 28) ULA is meeting with the Texas A&M pro-life
group for the Texas Rally for Life. The March begins at Republic
Square (4th and Guadalupe) at 1 PM, and the Rally at the Capitol begins
at 2 PM.
November 30, 2005
Erin recently debated about abortion with another student at a freshman
class on campus. Jordan assisted her, and the debate went very
well. The opposing debater was forced to make disingenuous
statements to avoid admitting a serious flaw in her pro-abortion
position.
We just had our last meeting of the semester
last night, and we have lots of stuff going on in January, including
our Roe v. Wade rally, display, and possibly a student abortion debate
against Voices for Choice. Good luck on finals, and we will see
you early next year!
-
Here is a pamphlet entitled "A Woman's Right to
Know," published by the Texas Department of Health. The Woman's
Right to
Know Act requires all doctors in the state make this available to
women
considering abortion.
-
This is a lovely bit about a man named
Ron Fitzsimmons, director of the National
Coalition of Abortion Providers. He once claimed that partial-birth
abortions were only performed when the mother's life was in danger or
the fetus
was dangerously malformed or dysfuncional. He now says he lied, and
that such
"procedures" are performed routinely on healthy babies and healthy
mothers. (link)
- People in the pro-abortion camp will often be heard
claiming that partial-birth
abortion is a made up term, politically motivated, vague, and will not
be found in
medical dictionaries. Here are two online medical dictionaries, both of
which have
definitions of "partial-birth abortion" and neither of which have a
definition of
"dilation and extraction" or "dilation and evacuation":
-
Roe v. Wade, January 22, 1973
(html)
The infamous decision which first prohibited states from restricting
abortion during the first two trimesters of pregnancy. Justice Blackmun
delivered the
opinion of the court.
-
Webster v. Reproductive Health
Services, July 3, 1989 (html)
A decision reversing a District Court which had struck down a Missouri
Law
prohibiting abortion beyond the 20th week of pregnancy, among other
restrictions. Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the court,
joined by
White, O'Connor, Scalia, and Kennedy.
- Blackmun concurring in part, dissenting in part, joined
by Brennan and Marshall (html)
- Scalia concurring in part (html)
-
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, June
29, 1992 (html)
The Supreme Court of the United States, in a 5-4 decision, reaffirmed a
woman's liberty to have an abortion as it had in the Roe v. Wade
decision. The Court, however, upheld most of the state of
Pennsylvania's abortion control law provisions reasoning that these
provisions do not create an "undue burden" or "substantial obstacle"
for women seeking an abortion. Under this new "undue burden" test
(whatever that means), the only provision to fail was the husband
notification requirement. Justices O'Connor, Kennedy,
and Souter delivered the opinion of the court.
- Stevens concurring in part, dissenting in part (html)
- Blackmun concurring in part, dissenting in part (html)
- Rehnquist concurring in part, dissenting in part,
joined by Scalia, Thomas, and White (html)
- Scalia concurring in part, dissenting in part, joined
by Rehnquist, Thomas, and White (html)
-
Stenberg v. Carhart, June 28, 2000
(pdf)
The court invalidated a Nebraska state law which proscribed
partial-birth abortion as a felony. The court cited the lack of an
exception for the "health" of the mother as the primary cause for
invalidation, and rested this opinion upon the previous decsion of Casey.
Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the court.
- Rehnquist dissenting (pdf)
- Scalia dissenting (pdf)
- Kennedy dissenting (pdf)
- Thomas dissenting (pdf)
- O'Connor concurring (pdf)
- Ginsburg concurring (pdf)
- Stevens concurring (pdf)
| Other
Pro-Life Organizations |
|